The Fate of Google Buzz is Sealed

Google unveiled it’s latest innovation yesterday. I watched the webcast and was amused at how some attendees were quick to say, “Um, this looks like Facebook. How is it really innovative?”
Then a bunch of nerds got up this morning and started twitching (Twitter bitching (or acute muscle spasms)) that Google Buzz was stupid and they weren’t convinced it was going to be anything special.
Some even said it was doomed for failure.
How could they possibly know that? It has been out less than a day and only available to a small number of users and they’ve already solidified the fate of Buzz? Give me a break!
So why do some people already HATE Google Buzz?
The simple answer is that they are already firmly rooted in their social network happy places and don’t want to see anything or anyone crap on their Utopia.
Many self-proclaimed social media gurus often ask unnecessary questions like, “What’s the next Twitter or Facebook?” Or, “What does the future of social networking look like?” They try to stay ahead of what hasn’t even happened yet (yeah, wtf? I know!) because they get some sort of validation from it. However, when something comes along that could really set the stage for the future of social networking they immediately balk at it.
Actually, let’s broaden that statement and tell it like it is: When ANYTHING NEW comes along they immediately take a dump on it.
Has anyone else noticed this trend? Or am I just a wild optimist and think everything new is grand? Apparently, in order to be Web 2.0 savvy or a social media rock star, you have to annihilate any and every new idea with a negative tweet or blog post. I’m not saying let’s commit to love at first sight (or site, as the case may be), but I’d love to know why everything has to be seen as a negative straight out of the gate.
Here are a few examples of tweets from the Twitosphere (it literally pains me to type that) regarding Google Buzz:
- Much a buzz about nothing – Why Google Buzz will fail. http://ow.ly/15V2R (via @grahamjones)
- Feeling curmudgeonly because I just want email to be email, I don’t want it to “buzz”. (via @jspad)
- Yo Google Buzz, I’m really happy for you and I’mma let you finish, but Twitter is one of best social networks of all time. (via @nickellis)
- Beginning to think that Google Buzz is just more noise added to the mix. (via @shindz)
Now that was just a quick sampling, but it represents the majority of what all of these die hard twits are saying about Buzz.
Look, I’m on Twitter (@willsloan) and I like it for what it is. It has a specific purpose and use; just as Facebook, Four Square, YouTube and others do. They are all individual tools with individual purposes in the realm of social networking. You don’t hammer a screw in. You find the right tool for the job and use it for what it was designed for. This is why I get all pissy when people try to compare Twitter to Facebook. Apples to oranges. Cake to ice cream. Stop. Comparing. Them.
Here is why Google Buzz is significant and, yes, innovative. They have taken their own version of these individual tools and placed them all in the same toolbox. Whoa! Before you stop reading this and go directly to the comment box to strike up an argument — I am keenly aware that you can connect Facebook with Twitter with YouTube with FriendFeed with Tumbr with living tissue (well, not yet but soon), etc. and so on. BUT (intentionally big but) you are still using individual accounts on individual sites. Not to mention what a pain in the nads it is to set some of these connections up. Let’s also not forget maintaining them. Barf.
I log in with my one and only (and very much loved) Google account and I have access to all of these features in one place with minimal setup and minimal maintenance. By the way, want to follow me on buzz? Click here! Not to mention the impressive array of Google apps that already exist and could soon be integrated into Buzz. My mind is wild with the possibilities here.
Graham Jones (Internet Psychologist, Internet Consultant, Author, Speaker, Broadcaster, Internet Blowhard) blogged, “[Google Buzz] is no more than an ‘integrator’.” Wait a sec. You think this is a negative aspect, Graham? Really? Can someone explain to my why integration is bad? Integration is attractive, my friends. I like having all of my eggs in one basket. So do you, you big nay-saying liar! Your Twitter account is connected to all of your other social networking sites for the purpose of convenience, brought to you by… integration. Graham, you’re an Internet Psychologist (?) not an Internet Psychic. Stop gazing into your crystal balls.
Graham also puked up this gem, “Don’t judge the likely success of Google Buzz on the technophiles,” claiming that the only people who use Gmail currently “are online geeks who just love using the technology.” What an asshole. You can reach him at graham.jones@gmail.com – okay, not really… or maybe.
Is Google Buzz the Twitter/Facebook/Four Square killer? Who knows? But let’s freaking give it a chance to contend properly with the big boys before we go writing it off!
I think there is some serious promise in what Google is offering. I’m admittedly a Google Fanboy. I love what they do and how they do it and I will give Buzz the chance it deserves before blasting its suckage on Facebook and Twitter.
Let’s also keep in mind, as they stated at the press conference yesterday, that Buzz is still in it’s infancy and is going to continue being developed based on user feedback. Do you really think Facebook was built in a day? So let’s take some of that negative static and turn it into constructive criticism for the developers. Why don’t you help them out instead of looking like giant elitist asses? Hmmm? I’ve already noted quite a few things that would improve it, but that doesn’t mean I hate it.
UPDATE: My friend and fellow blogger, Brett Milner, wrote up a great article for any of you Google Apps users. A whole different problem. Same outcome.
Now it’s your turn. Go ahead. Let me have it. I won’t censor you.
Let’s talk about it!
- What are your thoughts on Buzz?
- How do you think this will impact the social network scene?
- Could it threaten the social network Goliaths?











Yeah I like Tumblr a lot. Our family blog is on there and my personal blog if I feel like writing something more than just posting a link. I like the simpleness of it and how each post is focused on one thing.
Definitely. Instead of writing a list of all the improvements the Google Dev guys need to make, I'm just going to say, "Make it like Tumblr. Period."
Reminds me of how people that get really into indie bands that no one has ever heard of turn on those bands as soon as they get a video on MTV or a single on the radio. Instead of being happy for the band they used to love, they immediately ridicule them for selling out because they aren't "their band" anymore. Then they go off to find an even more obscure band so they can be the one amongst all of their clueless friends that "gets it" and "discovered" Band X.
Damn, that is excellent. I've always hated that too. It's only trendy if it's indie. Psh.
Well put. What's up with this hating something that isn't instantly perfect and flawless and waxes your car while mixing a dry martini? If everyone was like this, we'd have all thought Vista sucked and avoided it and switched to Macs or held out for Windows 7. Oh, wait…
I am curious to see where they take it. "Facebook wasn't built in a day" is exactly the point.
I'll have something up about this myself soon, but from a different angle.
Thanks, man. So far, I've had a pretty decent experience with Buzz. It can only get better as it's developed. Looking forward to reading your post! You should post a link here when you get it up.
You got it-
http://www.alienlogic.org/technologic/2010/2/18/w...
I'm looking forward to seeing this deployed on Google Apps myself, when it's ready. I have a Gmail account, but I have it forwarded to my own GApps domain and don't want to reverse all of that or have to use two logins if it's not needed.
Do you have alienlogic.com registered with Google but hosted on squarespace? Or is this a diff domain? I have a friend who runs his site on Google and he raves about it. (http://www.rogueimagery.com) He's a Flash designer/animator – does some wicked cool stuff. We're hoping to collaborate on a new business venture sometime in the near future doing web presence for SMBs. Like a one stop shop for a business who in interested in creating or revamping their online presence. Web design, SEO, social media, etc. All under one roof.
That site is run on Google? Is he actually using Google Sites? If so I'd love to know how he got around the limitations, including not having "Powered by Google Sites" at the bottom of the page. If he's not using that, then I'm curious which specific service it is based on.
I've seen some cool examples of integration that can be done on Google Sites even within the hard limitations (no custom CSS, no JavaScript). Here's one example- http://www.sadasystems.com
I have alienlogic.org (don't have .com or .net) pointing to Google for mail and a few CNAME records for things like Calendar and Google Docs. The domain root and www both point to Squarespace.
I've thought about redoing (not going live, but just as a test) alienlogic on Google Sites, just to see what can be done within those limitations.
Enjoyed reading your glowing review (thanks to a link from Brett's blog). I'm trying not to be unreasonably anti-Buzz, but I just haven't seen it add anything to my social networking experience. Twitter will be around for a long time because of its simplicity. I don't put much unique content on Facebook because of it's smaller, friend-only, scope. One of these days, I'll blog about my love for FriendFeed. In the meantime, here's my Buzz rant
http://zepfanman.com/1c
Yeah, I still have issues with that on my accounts. I hate the whole robo-posting thing. It doesn't have the personal touch. I'd love to narrow my activity down to one site… like, say Google Buzz.
A year from now I think I'll have abandoned Facebook and Twitter. The guys at Google wouldn't make such a big stink about this if they weren't willing to go to bat with the big league. Buzz will only get better so I'm sticking around.
Yeah I've already abandoned Twitter except to enter the contests people love to have now to try to get their message trending on there. I imagine I'll be with FB for a while because it has become so ubiquitous. Even my mom and little brother have Facebook accounts. That probably won't happen with another site for a while.
The only reason I haven't abandoned Twitter yet is I do actually generate some moderately decent site traffic with it. I still think Tumblr is one of the richest social media sites but its slow and full of annoying, perverted teenagers. If Buzz could achieve what Tumblr offers but with the integration and quality that Google is known for they should be good to go.
Well that's what he said or maybe that's how I understood it. I'll ask him to be sure. Maybe he's just doing it like you are and hosting elsewhere but using Google as his domain registrar. I know nothing about Google Sites. Never had a need to know. It's crazy that they would have those kind of limitations. That's why I hated Office Live. Same situation but I was at least able to write is some custom CSS.
Sorry for the TLD goof. I knew it was .org but .com just came off the fingers somehow. Careless typing.
Not at all- believe me I wish I had been able to pick up alienlogic.com and .net, but if you try them you'll see their being sat on by one of those squatting "companies". And I'm not going down the road of asking them what they want for them.
One thing worth mentioning about Squarespace with respect to the site you and your friend are planning- with Squarespace it's a breeze to setup multiple blogs and authors on the same site, something that's difficult to pull off in many CMSs. That may or may not be useful to you.
As far as Google Sites, it does have three specific pluses I can think of, IF what you want to do can happen within the constraints.
-You won't have to worry about scalability for any amount of traffic. It's on Google's infrastructure after all.
-You can embed Google gadgets for extra functionality, and if one doesn't exist that you need, they're reportedly very easy to write code for. SADA systems apparently did that for their site.
-Having those kind of constraints might actually be liberating for creativity as you push the limits of what can be done. Still wouldn't use it for a photographer's portfolio though
Thanks for the reference update!